Bisexuality NEEDS to reach the manosphere. A little throuple of an alpha, beta, and delta would work so beautifully. They’d be their own self sustaining economy of high-value men who work together instead of tearing each other (and women) down. And idk, maybe a nonbinary gamma male could join them, or they even hook up with a throuple of three high-value bisexual women from time to time. This would be so awesome : (
btw an important figure in feminist history being a trans man does not erase their importance or significance because trans men are also oppressed by the patriarchy. trans men's defiance against misogyny is not somehow less radical because they aren't a woman. feminism has gotta stop clinging to woman-identity as the most important thing wrt anti-patriarchal action
genderkoolaid:
its important to talk about how being a woman is not inherently anti-patriarchal & how anyone, including men, can be anti-patriarchal. but what specifically annoys me is the idea that trans men's experience with patriarchy & misogyny is somehow lesser than cis women's, that our stories of resistance are less important and that by transitioning/identifying as a man it devalues our entire existence in relation to feminism.
what specifically prompted this post was pauli murray. there is substantial evidence that pauli was transmasculine & likely would have identified as a trans man if the concept existed then; and by substantial evidence i mean he changed his name to an androgynous one, wanted to be examined to see if he had undescended testes, was well known to have had gender dysphoria, and literally pursued HRT for years. he was publicly a woman and did a massive amount for feminism & specifically Black feminism. and yet, everywhere, he is referred to with she/her pronouns. not even they/them, which is pretty common when there's a question of gender identity in a historical figure- she/her, because how can we square an important feminist figure who suffered due to misogyny/misogynoir with non-female identity? how could pauli murray be remembered as a feminist icon who bravely resisted sexism if we remember him as a trans man?
even this article calling out the cissexism in how pauli murray is discussed has this strange line:
It is easier, for example, to attribute Murray’s tireless campaign against sexism to his essentialized womanhood than to consider the possibility that Murray’s indignation might have stemmed from his sense that as a man, he should not have been subjected.
Which I find strange because it implies that the most logical reason a trans man would be so vigorously anti-sexism is because he feels a man shouldn't have to deal with it. instead of.... for the same reasons women are anti-sexism? because they suffer from its oppression and also are morally opposed to it? cisfeminists are like. stuck between "trans men are cis women who are being weird" or "trans men are cis men who are fucked over a bit more." cisfeminists are like "but if i cant relate every trans experience back to the cisbinary how am i supposed to understand gender???????"
Facebook deleted this almost immediately. It's almost like the ultrawealthy don't want us knowing or talking about what's at stake.
2000 was almost 14 years ago
2000 was almost 14 years ago
2000 was almost 14 years ago
lordoftablecloths:
hey op guess what
lordoftablecloths:
oh nevermind you’re died
ARIEL NEEDS LEGS
I was gonna make Emmy draw this but she said no so I drew it myself.
I’ve never drawn a comic before!
pro-gay:
Happy 9th birthday to this post specifically.
carnival-phantasm:
Happy 10th birthday babey!!!!
snoopy of the day
millerhighlifethechampagneofbeer:
someone make the outside of the car minecraft
thatmew:
Yo where tf my silt strider taking me
He served cunt. Nasty, descrepit, rotten, fetid cunt but he did serve it
Anonymous asked:
why are you so obsessed with your gender get a real job
sweatermuppet replied:
i frolic joyously whilst you seethe
Anonymous asked:
im gonna keep wearing make up and your bitchy little "im so much better and cooler than other girls" post isnt gonna stop me <3.
tiktaalic replied:
Hi. You’re getting defensive about something you perceive as a personal attack and it’s blinding your critical thinking. If you skim the tags for half a second you’ll see dozens of people talking about how they feel a deep encompassing shame if they go anywhere without wearing makeup. I think it’s bad that people have been conditioned to be embarrassed of their own face. I never got into makeup, but when I was in high school I made the decision to delete Snapchat forever because it got to the point where my stomach would drop every time my face went from Filtered Face to my own face.
It’s good and healthy to develop your self esteem enough to feel comfortable around other people in public without makeup. it takes 2 seconds to look and see that’s clearly not the case for so many people. I have nothing but empathy and respect for the people who are aware they have a problem and are scared of the amounts of work they have to do to get past it.
And Odds are, people who have a healthy relationship with makeup are not people who get so ruffled by a post that states “some people are addicted to makeup” that they send anons calling someone a bitch. I think it’s worth it to consider and sit with why you had such a knee jerk reaction to an innocuous statement. Wish you nothing but the best and a good day to boot.